This was a short essay that I wrote to scuola.L 'argument to be had Machiavelli, his morals and politics, by referred to some notes of Antonio Gramsci and Guido Calogero.
E 'right to health is a priority of the State', as people to live well must live in the well-being, understood in all its forms of manifestation (economic, social, personal, etc. ..). The was in good health makes you feel the people, but at the same time the people that is comfortable to wear the state high livelli.Ma what 's the way forward to implement an effective policy and make a state right?
It 's a question that has' been debated throughout history and has produced more' locations.
Niccolo 'Machiavelli, the great character of the Renaissance, expressed his views in his work, perhaps the most' famous, The Principe.Egli argues that beginning must be a strong man with clear ideas, powerful, charismatic, acting for the good of the State cittadini.Serve a firm stand by a man who has the ability 'to format, capable of ensuring order and stability '.
Once you reach this important goal, Machiavelli suggests that a republic is formed (similar to that of Rome) which gives continuity 'and established' and that would make most 'people share.
emerges clearly, even partially aware of the contents of The Prince, Machiavelli put that policy in the foreground, seen as an activity 'religiosa.La autonomous and detached from morality politics has, in fact, his own "moral", which though it will 'seem not relevant to the customs, and' necessary for the good life, an example of this moral and 'the phrase passed into history as "the end justifies the means."
But this thought, and 'to be considered related only to a historical period gone o' adaptable to any age? Porta perhaps this detachment between morality and politics, to an alienation between those who command and who is controlled?
Antonio Gramsci, the famous leader of the Communist Party, he wondered, as is apparent in his notebooks written during his imprisonment under the fascist regime, if the writer with his thesis on Renaissance wanted to accentuate the gap between rulers and ruled, and taught that there are exactly two cultures between rulers and the ruled.
Gramsci arrival 'to the conclusion that Machiavelli, in order to avoid so that the powerful can somehow damage the weak, wanted to suggest to the commands to find "a leader who knows what' they want and how to get what 'they want and to accept it enthusiasm, although his actions may or opinion contrary to the ideology of the time, religion
Prince, adapted to the twentieth century, was to be a party, capable of founding a new state (Gramsci wanted to PCI, but historians think that the have made Mussolini's Italy and Stalin in Russia). Guido Calogero
wisdom defines Machiavellian as "strong smell of vinegar," since 'sostuiene the Prince manages to work "Without getting caught by nausea for politics, and that 'one of the usual moralizing pretext of selfishness." All
Machiavelli suggests a creator of a new political vision, in favor of man and therefore the State giusto.Sembrerebbe that Prince, in spite of his morals, his firmness and power, he still cares about the citizens, those who enliven the state.
This could be retrofitted to this day, and 'right that the ruling class who cares about the people who will feel' good co nla result that the whole state stara 'bene.Questo feeling behind the health of the state.
act for the good of the city means to act for the good of the state.
0 comments:
Post a Comment